Independent Panel Finds Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Environmentally Acceptable

Posted on

On Dec. 30, 2010, Canada’s Mackenzie Valley natural gas pipeline project received the stamp of approval from an independent panel charged with considering the environmental, social and economic impacts of the proposed 1,200-km line on the Northwest Territories.
  In a statement of conditional support for the massive project, the joint review panel for the Mackenzie project said the region’s future would be better served with the $16-billion pipeline and associated development than without.
  “The panel is confident that the project as filed, if built and operated with full implementation of the panel’s recommendations, would deliver valuable and lasting overall benefits, and avoid significant adverse environmental impacts,” the panel said in a news release.
  The long-awaited news from the panel was reportedly received with muted enthusiasm from project stakeholders, which include Imperial Oil Ltd., ConocoPhillips, Royal Dutch Shell, ExxonMobil Corp. and the Aboriginal Pipeline Group.
  As proposed the pipeline would ship up to 1.9 Bcf/d of natural gas from the edge of the Beaufort Sea to Alberta. The consortium filed an application for the project with the National Energy Board in February 2004, and the review panel was launched two years later.
  The panel made 176 recommendations, including directing the federal government to “engage in the activities and commit the funding required to implement things it has already committed to do.”
  In January, Ottawa announced it was offering a fiscal framework in support of the project, including support for infrastructure projects, but has yet to disclose details.
  Pipeline stakeholders have three weeks to respond to the joint review panel report, which also was submitted to Ottawa, the Northwest Territories government and the National Energy Board.
  The board will conduct a final hearing on the project in April and release its decision in September.